0295-01.html.docx
Woodworth vs. Fulton et al. A grant of public lands in San Francisco made by an American Alcalde, during the continuance of the war between the United...
0423-01.html.docx
Brown vs. Howard & Howard. Where it appears clearly from a charter-party, that the intention of the owner of the ship and the charterer is that the fo...
0359-01.html.docx
Snow vs. Halstead. An action for obtaining property by false and fraudulent representations, cannot be sustained, where it appears on the face of the ...
0481-01.html.docx
Brooks et al. vs. Minturn. An answer to a complaint after demurrer overrules the demurrer. The owner of a ship, chartered by, and in the name of, his ...
0363-01.html.docx
George vs. Law et al. This court will not interfere with the verdict of a jury, where the question upon which they have passed is one solely of unliqu...
0133-01.html.docx
Horrell vs. Gray. A Second Alcalde has not jurisdiction of any claim exceeding $100. Thus where judgment was rendered by him for $1030,50, it was reve...
0132-01.html.docx
Johnson vs. Pendleton et al. Where there is conflicting evidence on the trial of a cause and no rule of law appears to have been violated, a judgment ...
0131-01.html.docx
Parker vs. Shephard et al. Where a summons was issued and served in the morning, by which the defendants were cited to appear and answer the complaint...
0441-01.html.docx
Bryant vs. Mead. The plaintiff being the keeper of a public gaming-room in the city of San Francisco, won of the defendant $4000 at the game of Faro. ...
0322-01.html.docx
Reynolds vs. West. The decision in Woodworth v. Fulton, that a grant of lands in San Francisco, made by an American Alcalde, during the continuance of...
0426-01.html.docx
Young vs. Starkey et al. A. and the defendants submitted certain matters in difference between them to the arbitration of the plaintiff, under an agre...
0162-01.html.docx
Souter vs. The Sea Witch. An act of the legislature authorized the issuing of attachments against boats and vessels “ used in navigating the waters of...
0450-01.html.docx
De Briar vs. Minturn. Where no definite period of employment is agreed upon between a master and servant, the master has a right to discharge the serv...
0200-01.html.docx
Mickle et al. vs. Sanchez. The plaintiffs held certain security on real estate for the payment of an indebtedness of M. to them, but gave up and cance...
0406-01.html.docx
The People ex rel. Alexander Campbell vs. Clark. Where a statute is declared to take effect from and after its passage, it takes effect at the very mo...
0428-01.html.docx
Thompson vs. Manrow. A certificate of exemplification of a judgment rendered in another state, when attested by the clerk under the seal of the court,...
0437-01.html.docx
Dennison vs. Smith. It is too late to object at the trial that a bill of particulars is not properly verified by the oath of the party. The party upon...
0347-01.html.docx
White vs. Lighthall et al. The appellate jurisdiction of this court does not extend over judgments of inferior tribunals, from whose decisions no appe...
0134-01.html.docx
Belt vs. Davis. By a final judgment is to be understood, not a final determination of the rights of the parlies in the subject matter of the litigatio...
0188-01.html.docx
The People, ex rel. Field vs. Turner, Judge of the Eighth Judicial District. An attachment will not be issued against, a district judge for non-compli...